Who Goes First? The Quiet Philosophy Hiding in Your Turn Order
Photo by Photo by clement proust on Unsplash on Unsplash
Ask a table of RPG players about initiative and you'll usually get a shrug. It's the thing you do after rolling perception, right? The GM counts down a list, the wizard groans about being last, and everyone waits their turn.
But here's the thing: initiative is a design choice, and probably a bigger one than the rulebook lets on. The moment you decide how turn order works, you've made a call about what kind of game you're running — whether you meant to or not.
The Default: Cyclic Order and What It Buys You
Most modern systems use cyclic initiative: everyone rolls, you sort highest to lowest, and the order repeats every round. It's familiar, it's fair-feeling, and it produces a predictable rhythm players can plan around.
The upside is engagement. When a rogue knows she acts right after the fighter, she can set up combos. When the whole table knows the big brute swings on count three, everyone braces for it. Predictability creates anticipation, which is a storyteller's best friend.
The downside? Speed wins. A fast character who rolls well acts twice before slow characters act once, and in a five-round fight, that gap compounds. If your table includes someone whose character concept is "plodding but tough," cyclic order can quietly tell them their turns matter less.
Speed Factors: When Slow and Steady Actually Gets a Turn
Older editions of D&D — and systems like HackMaster — experimented with speed factors, where your weapon or spell determines when you act. A dagger strikes before a greatsword. A quick bolt of magic beats a carefully aimed crossbow.
This variant says something very different about your world: reaching the fight matters, but what you bring matters more. It's great for gritty, tactical games where weapon choice is a meaningful decision rather than a flavor line on the character sheet.
The cost is friction. Speed factors add a lookup step to every round, and if your players already struggle to remember which die is their d10, you're adding homework. Run this style with experienced tables or systems that build it in from the ground up.
Side-Based Initiative: War Stories, Not Stat Blocks
Side-based initiative — the whole party goes, then all the monsters go — is the old-school workhorse. Original D&D did it this way, and games like Shadow of the Demon Lord's cousins and various OSR titles keep it alive.
What it buys you is narrative momentum. Instead of six individual turns, you get two big waves: the heroes' plan, then the world's response. Players coordinate naturally because there's no strict order to hide behind. The party that talks things out acts like a team, because mechanically, they are one.
It also dramatically speeds up combat. No tracking a list, no "wait, has the goblin gone yet?" If your sessions run long and your fights drag, this might be the cheapest fix available.
The tradeoff is that individual spotlight moments get fuzzier. Your barbarian's cinematic leap across the chasm competes with everyone else's move for the same narrative beat.
Simultaneous Resolution: Chaos as a Feature
A few systems — and plenty of homebrew tables — resolve everything at once. Everyone declares an action, everyone rolls, and the results land together. You attack the ogre; the ogre, it turns out, was attacking you. Both hits land. Nobody gets to react.
This is the highest-stakes option. It says your world doesn't wait for people. It's tense, it's brutal, and it produces stories players recount for years — the mutual takedown, the double knockout, the round where everything went wrong at once.
It's also the hardest to referee. Simultaneous resolution demands a GM comfortable with ruling on the fly, and players who accept that declaring an action is a commitment, not an opening bid.
So Which One Is Yours?
Try asking yourself three questions:
- Do my players plan like a team or a queue? Team-brained groups thrive with side-based order. Queue-brained tacticians want a strict list.
- Is speed or weight more dramatic at my table? Fast, cinematic games favor simple cyclic order. Gritty, deliberate games can support speed factors.
- How much math can I sustain at midnight? Be honest. The coolest initiative system is worthless if you can't run it during the third combat of a long session.
And remember: nothing stops you from changing mid-campaign. A heist arc might sing with simultaneous resolution, while your dungeon crawl runs cleanest on a classic list. Switching styles between arcs is a legitimate GM tool, not a rules violation.
The turn order you choose won't show up on any character sheet, but it echoes through every fight you run. Pick the one that makes your table lean in — because who goes first should always serve the story you're actually telling.
